Carried Interest Tax Calculator
Compute the tax on fund carry under the section 1061 three-year rule — what gets recharacterised as short-term, what escapes through the capital-interest and 1231 carve-outs, and what waiting is worth.
How to use this calculator
- 1Enter the long-term gains allocated through your carry for the year, from the draft K-1 or the fund’s allocation schedule.
- 2Split them by the fund’s holding period in each exited asset — the deal-by-deal detail is exactly what the API reporting rules make the fund give you.
- 3Mark the section 1231 share for real-asset funds; it changes character entirely.
- 4Keep your own invested capital in its own field — it is outside the section, and mixing it in overstates the damage.
How the calculation works
Recharacterised = carry gains from assets held ≤ 3 years, excluding section 1231 gains — taxed as short-term. Long-term = seasoned deals + 1231 gains + gains on contributed capital. Cost of the rule = recharacterised × (ordinary − long-term rate)- Section 1061(a)
- Net long-term gain recomputed under section 1222 with "3 years" for "1 year"; the shortfall is short-term gain
- Look-through
- The holding period tested is the fund’s period in each asset sold, not the holder’s period in the carry
- 1061(c)(4)(B)
- Capital interests commensurate with contributed capital are outside the section — the GP commitment follows one-year rules
- The 1231 carve-out
- Section 1231 gains never pass through the recomputed 1222 paragraphs; Treas. Reg. 1.1061-4(b)(7) confirms they escape
Long-term gains are priced at the top rate plus NIIT; recharacterised gains at the ordinary rate plus NIIT — the swing is seventeen points at the top, before state tax.
Sales of the carry interest itself are tested on the interest’s own holding period, a different question from the asset-level test modelled here.
Section 1061(d) makes transfers of carry to related persons a recognition event for sub-three-year gains.
Worked example
A $2m carry year, 60% from seasoned deals
- 1.$1.2m of the carry came from assets the fund held past three years, and keeps long-term treatment at 23.8%.
- 2.The $800,000 from quicker exits is recharacterised as short-term — 40.8% instead of 23.8%.
- 3.That recharacterisation costs $136,000, the seventeen-point swing on the unseasoned slice.
- 4.The $200,000 on the GP commitment stays outside the section under 1061(c)(4)(B), at ordinary one-year rules.
Result: $659,600 of tax — $136,000 of it the price of the three-year rule
A real-estate fund: the same carry, 80% section 1231
- 1.$1.6m of the carry is section 1231 gain on depreciable property — outside section 1061 no matter the holding period.
- 2.Only the remaining $400,000 is tested, and 60% of that clears three years anyway.
- 3.The recharacterised slice shrinks to $160,000, and the cost of the rule falls to $27,200.
- 4.This is the structural reason real-estate carry was barely touched by the three-year rule — paragraph mechanics, not lobbying.
Result: The 1231 carve-out cuts the rule’s cost from $136,000 to $27,200
What the three-year rule actually does
Carried interest is a profit share received for running other people’s money, and for decades it took long-term capital gains treatment on the same one-year holding period as everything else. Since 2018, section 1061 has applied a stricter clock to "applicable partnership interests" — carry, in substance: the holder’s net long-term gain is recomputed under section 1222 with three years substituted for one, and whatever fails the substitution is treated as short-term capital gain.
Short-term means ordinary rates. At the top, with the net investment income tax on both sides, the swing is 23.8% against 40.8% — seventeen points on every recharacterised dollar. The rule did not abolish the capital-gains treatment of carry, whatever the headlines said; it priced impatience.
The test is asset-by-asset and looks through the fund. What matters for gains allocated through the carry is how long the PARTNERSHIP held the company it sold — not how long the manager has held the carry. A ten-year-old carry is recharacterised on a two-year flip; a partner admitted last month takes long-term treatment on a deal the fund seasoned for five years. This surprises people in both directions, and it is the reporting the regulations force funds to hand their partners each year.
The three ways money escapes the section
The first is seasoning, and it is why the rule quietly changed exit behaviour: a fund weighing a sale at month thirty-three of a hold has $136,000 of partner-level reasons per $800,000 of carry to wait for month thirty-seven. Private equity holding periods were mostly past three years already, which is why the section raised far less revenue than advertised; venture funds with quick markups and quicker acquisitions feel it more.
The second is the capital interest exception. Gains commensurate with capital the manager actually contributed — the GP commitment — are outside the section under 1061(c)(4)(B), tested under the ordinary one-year rule. The boundary is bookkeeping: the exception protects capital-account economics that match what outside investors get for their money, and funds that blur the line between the carry waterfall and the capital account put the exclusion at risk.
The third is the structural one. Subsection (a) recomputes net long-term gain only through paragraphs (3) and (4) of section 1222 — and section 1231 gains, the character of gains on depreciable business property, arrive at net capital gain without ever passing through those paragraphs. The regulations confirm what the mechanics imply: 1231 gains and qualified dividends are outside the recharacterisation entirely. A real-estate fund selling buildings generates carry that mostly never meets the three-year test. That is not a loophole someone found; it is how the section was drafted, and it has survived every technical-corrections cycle since.
The traps on the other side
Section 1061(d) is the one that catches sophisticated people. Transferring carry to a related person — the children’s trust, the spouse’s LLC — does not carry the holding period quietly across; the transfer is itself a recognition event, forcing short-term gain on the transferor for sub-three-year assets at that moment. Estate planning with carry happens, extensively, but it is planned around this subsection with valuation and timing, not through it.
The corporation exception is the other closed door. Subsection (c)(4)(A) excludes interests held by a corporation, and for one optimistic season that read like an invitation to hold carry through an S corporation — pass-through taxation with a corporate wrapper. The IRS said no within months, the regulations confine the exception to C corporations, and paying twenty-one percent corporate tax plus dividend tax to escape a seventeen-point recharacterisation is arithmetic nobody chooses.
What remains is the discipline the section actually imposes: deal-level holding-period records, clean separation of capital accounts from the carry waterfall, and exit calendars that notice the three-year line. The tax on carry was not repealed; it was made a scheduling problem — and this page prices the schedule.
What this assumes, and where it stops
Assumptions
- Long-term gains are taxed at the top federal rate plus NIIT, and recharacterised gains at the entered ordinary rate plus NIIT — the incomes involved support both.
- The over-three-years share is measured on the fund’s holding period in each exited asset, as the API reporting rules require funds to disclose.
- Gains on contributed capital qualify cleanly for the 1061(c)(4)(B) exception.
- Section 1231 gains are net gains treated as long-term; 1231 loss recapture is not modelled.
- State tax applies equally to both characters of gain.
- The carry is held directly by an individual; no blocker or corporate structure intervenes.
Limitations
- Sales of the carry interest itself follow the interest-level holding period and the lookthrough rule, not modelled here.
- The section 1061(d) related-party recognition amount is warned about, not computed.
- Installment sales, mixed straddle years and loss netting across buckets are out of scope.
- Fee waivers and management-fee conversions raise section 707 questions this page does not touch.
- Qualified small business stock allocated through a fund carries its own section 1202 analysis — see the QSBS calculator.
- The section is a perennial legislative target; the monitored source watches for the amendment that is proposed every cycle.
Common questions
How is carried interest taxed under the three-year rule?
Gains allocated through carry keep long-term capital gains treatment only where the fund held the sold asset for more than three years; the rest is recharacterised as short-term gain at ordinary rates. At the top the difference is 23.8% against 40.8% — seventeen points. The test is deal by deal on the fund’s holding period, not on how long you have held the carry, and funds must report the split to their partners.
Does the three-year rule apply to my invested capital in the fund?
No. Section 1061(c)(4)(B) excludes capital interests that share in the partnership commensurately with capital actually contributed — the GP commitment. Those gains follow the ordinary one-year rule. The exclusion depends on the fund’s books keeping the capital account cleanly separate from the carry waterfall, which well-run funds do as a matter of course.
Why does real-estate carry escape the three-year rule?
Because of how the section is drafted. Section 1061(a) recomputes net long-term gain only through paragraphs (3) and (4) of section 1222, and section 1231 gains — the character of gains on depreciable business property — reach net capital gain without passing through those paragraphs. The regulations confirm that 1231 gains and qualified dividends are outside the recharacterisation. Carry in funds selling buildings is therefore largely untouched, regardless of holding period.
Can I gift my carry to a family trust to avoid the rule?
The transfer itself is the taxable event. Section 1061(d) requires a holder who transfers carry to a related person to recognise short-term gain on the sub-three-year assets at that moment. Carry does move into estate plans — usually early, when values are low, with appraisals and timing built around this subsection — but a gift does not launder the holding period, and a casual transfer accelerates exactly the tax it hoped to avoid.
Does holding carry through an S corporation avoid section 1061?
No. The exception for interests "held by a corporation" was confined by the IRS and the regulations to C corporations almost immediately after enactment. An S corporation does not qualify, and a C corporation means corporate tax plus dividend tax — a worse result than the recharacterisation it would avoid. No entity wrapper beats simply seasoning the assets past three years.
Sources
- 26 U.S. Code § 1061 — partnership interests held in connection with performance of services — Cornell Law School, Legal Information Institute
- Treas. Reg. § 1.1061-1 through -6 — carried interest regulations — Cornell Law School, Legal Information Institute
Formula and content last reviewed on .
Verified figuresThe 2 statutory data sets behind this page were last checked against US Internal Revenue Service and Cornell Law School, Legal Information Institute between 14 August 2026 and 26 August 2026, effective through 31 December 2026. Every figure, source and date
Results are estimates for information only, not professional advice.
Related calculators
Tools people commonly use alongside the carried interest tax calculator.