Cost Segregation Calculator
Work out whether a cost segregation study is worth its fee, counting the present value of accelerated depreciation against the ordinary-rate recapture it creates.
How to use this calculator
- 1Enter the purchase price and the land value, since land is never depreciated.
- 2Enter the shares a study would reclassify into 5-year personal property and 15-year land improvements — take these from the study, not from a rule of thumb.
- 3Enter your marginal rate, how long you expect to hold, and the discount rate you apply to money later.
- 4Compare the net value against the fee. If you intend a 1031 exchange or to hold until death, the recapture line largely disappears.
How the calculation works
Net value = present value of the extra deductions × your rate − present value of the extra recapture − the study fee- Reclassified property
- Components moved from the 27.5 or 39-year building schedule to 5-year personal property and 15-year land improvements, both eligible for bonus depreciation
- Section 1245 recapture
- Depreciation on reclassified personal property comes back at ordinary rates on sale, not the 25% that applies to building depreciation
- Discount rate
- What a dollar today is worth against a dollar later. The entire benefit is timing, so this drives the answer
Accelerating a deduction does not create one. The same total is deducted either way; only the timing changes.
The reclassification percentages must come from an engineering study — they are not something to estimate, and the IRS expects the study to support them.
A 1031 exchange defers the recapture and death gives heirs a stepped-up basis, either of which removes the recapture cost entirely.
Worked example
A $1.5m residential rental with $300,000 of land
- 1.Removing the land leaves $1,200,000 of depreciable basis.
- 2.A study moves $180,000 into 5-year property and $120,000 into 15-year land improvements, leaving $900,000 on the 27.5-year schedule.
- 3.Both reclassified buckets take 100% bonus in year one, so the first-year deduction jumps from about $43,600 to about $332,700.
- 4.That is worth roughly $101,000 of tax in year one, but every dollar of it is a dollar not deducted over the following 27 years.
- 5.The genuine benefit is the present value of that timing, less the ordinary-rate recapture on the $180,000 of personal property and the $10,000 fee.
Result: A substantial year-one deduction, and a much smaller real gain
The headline number is the wrong number
Cost segregation is sold on the first-year write-off, and the figure is genuinely large — six figures on a modest commercial building. It is also close to meaningless on its own.
A study does not create deductions. It moves them. Every dollar pulled into year one is a dollar that will not be deducted in years two through thirty-nine, and the total depreciation over the life of the property is identical either way. What you have actually bought is the use of the tax saving in the meantime.
That makes the benefit a present-value question, and it depends almost entirely on your discount rate. An investor who can deploy the cash at 12% gains a great deal; one who will leave it in a savings account gains very little. The same study, the same building, materially different answers.
This is why the honest version of the calculation discounts the deductions year by year rather than reporting the year-one figure. On a $1.2m depreciable basis with a quarter reclassified, the first-year saving can be a hundred thousand dollars while the real gain is a fraction of that.
The recapture the brochures skip
There is a second cost, and unlike the timing argument it is not merely a smaller benefit — it is a genuine loss that a study creates.
Depreciation on a building comes back on sale as unrecaptured section 1250 gain, which is capped at 25%. Depreciation on personal property — the appliances, carpet, cabinetry and removable fixtures a study reclassifies — is section 1245 property, and it comes back at ordinary income rates.
For the high earners who commission these studies, ordinary rates are 32% to 37%. So reclassifying a dollar of building into a dollar of personal property does not only accelerate the deduction; it swaps a recapture capped at 25% for one at up to 37%. On a large reclassification held to a taxable sale, that rate difference can consume a meaningful share of the timing benefit.
It is not a reason to avoid cost segregation. It is a reason the calculation has to include it, and most published comparisons do not.
When it is clearly worth it
Two situations remove the recapture cost entirely, and they are exactly the situations serious property investors are usually in.
A 1031 exchange defers the gain, including the recapture, into the replacement property. Roll from property to property and the recapture is never paid, only carried forward. And holding until death gives heirs a stepped-up basis, at which point the accumulated depreciation is wiped out and never recaptured at all. An investor following "swap till you drop" gets the acceleration and never pays for it.
Beyond that, the study has to be worth its fee, which typically runs from a few thousand on a small residential property to tens of thousands on a large commercial one. The break-even figure this calculator reports is the practical test: if the fee quoted exceeds it, the study does not pay.
One further point on timing. A study can be done years after purchase, catching up all the missed acceleration in a single year through a change of accounting method on Form 3115, without amending prior returns. That is often the strongest case of all — an owner three years in can take the entire accumulated adjustment at once.
What this assumes, and where it stops
Assumptions
- The reclassification percentages come from an engineering study rather than an estimate.
- Reclassified components qualify for the 100% bonus depreciation applying to property acquired after 19 January 2025.
- The property is sold at the end of the holding period in a taxable sale, with enough gain to absorb the recapture.
- Your marginal rate is constant over the period and applies to both the deduction and the ordinary-rate recapture.
Limitations
- Land improvements are section 1250 property whose recapture treatment depends on the depreciation method used; they are grouped here at the favourable 25% rate, so the recapture figure may be understated.
- A 1031 exchange or a step-up at death removes the recapture entirely, and neither is modelled.
- Passive activity loss rules can defer the benefit of a large first-year deduction for years, which this does not capture.
- State tax is excluded, and several states decouple from federal bonus depreciation.
- The mid-month and mid-quarter conventions are not applied, so first-year figures are slightly overstated.
Common questions
Is a cost segregation study worth it?
It depends on three things: how much can be reclassified, what discount rate you apply to money received sooner, and whether you will ever pay the recapture. A study on a property held to a taxable sale is worth considerably less than the first-year deduction suggests, because the deductions are only moved forward and the reclassified personal property recaptures at ordinary rates rather than 25%. For an investor who will 1031 exchange or hold until death, the recapture never arrives and the case is much stronger.
Does cost segregation create more depreciation?
No. It changes when depreciation is taken, not how much. The same total is deducted over the life of the property either way. What a study buys is the use of the tax saving in the intervening years, which is worth your discount rate on the deferred amount — real, but a fraction of the headline first-year figure.
What is the recapture problem with cost segregation?
Building depreciation is recaptured on sale as unrecaptured section 1250 gain, capped at 25%. Depreciation on the personal property a study reclassifies is section 1245 property and is recaptured at ordinary income rates, which can be 37%. So reclassifying converts part of a 25% liability into a 37% one. This is rarely mentioned in cost segregation marketing and can consume a significant share of the timing benefit on a property that is eventually sold.
Can I do a cost segregation study on a property I already own?
Yes, and it is often the strongest case. A study performed years after purchase lets you catch up all the depreciation you could have taken, in a single year, through a change of accounting method on Form 3115 — with no need to amend prior returns. An owner three or four years into holding a property can take the whole accumulated adjustment at once, which concentrates the benefit rather than spreading it.
Sources
- Publication 946 — How To Depreciate Property — US Internal Revenue Service
- Publication 544 — Sales and Other Dispositions of Assets — US Internal Revenue Service
- 26 U.S. Code § 1245 — Gain from dispositions of certain depreciable property — Cornell Law School, Legal Information Institute
Formula and content last reviewed on .
Results are estimates for information only, not professional advice.
Related calculators
Tools people commonly use alongside the cost segregation calculator.