Calories Burned Calculator

Estimate calories burned during any activity using MET values from the Compendium of Physical Activities.

How to use this calculator

  1. 1Enter your weight — it drives the whole calculation.
  2. 2Pick the activity closest to what you did and enter the duration.
  3. 3Use the "net of resting" figure when adjusting a calorie target, not the gross one.

How the calculation works

kcal per minute = MET × 3.5 × weight(kg) / 200
MET
Metabolic equivalent — multiples of resting energy expenditure
3.5
Oxygen consumption at rest, in ml per kg per minute
200
Converts millilitres of oxygen to kilocalories (5 kcal per litre of O₂)

One MET is defined as 3.5 ml of oxygen per kg per minute, roughly the cost of sitting quietly.

Because energy scales with body mass, a heavier person burns more calories doing the same activity.

The equation assumes a resting rate of exactly 1 MET, which is an approximation — actual resting rates vary with age, sex and body composition.

Worked example

75 kg, running at 10 km/h for 45 minutes

  1. 1.Running at 10 km/h has a MET value of 9.8.
  2. 2.Per minute: 9.8 × 3.5 × 75 ÷ 200 = 12.86 kcal.
  3. 3.Over 45 minutes: 12.86 × 45 = 579 kcal gross.
  4. 4.Resting would have burned 1.31 × 45 = 59 kcal, so the net figure is about 520 kcal.

Result: About 579 kcal gross, 520 kcal net

What a MET actually is

A MET, or metabolic equivalent of task, is defined as the energy cost of an activity expressed as a multiple of resting energy expenditure — one MET is roughly the cost of sitting quietly, and an activity rated at 8 METs uses about eight times that much energy per minute. Because it is a ratio rather than an absolute number, MET values scale naturally to a person’s size: multiplying by body weight is what converts the generic MET rating into an actual calorie estimate for a specific individual.

The Compendium of Physical Activities

The MET values behind this calculator come from the Compendium of Physical Activities, a standardised reference catalogue first published by exercise physiologist Barbara Ainsworth and colleagues in 1993 and periodically updated since, most recently in a major 2011 revision. It was created to solve a real problem in exercise research — studies describing exertion in inconsistent, subjective terms — by giving researchers and clinicians a common, comparable intensity value for hundreds of specific activities, from walking speeds to particular sports and household chores.

Why real-world calorie burn varies so much from the estimate

MET values are population averages measured under controlled conditions, and individual energy cost for the same activity can easily vary by 20% or more depending on movement efficiency, fitness level, terrain, temperature and body composition — a trained runner typically uses less energy at a given pace than an untrained one, for instance, because movement economy improves with practice. Consumer fitness trackers add a further layer of error on top of this: they estimate energy expenditure indirectly from heart rate and motion rather than measuring oxygen consumption directly, and independent validation studies have repeatedly found they can be off by 20–50%, usually in the direction of overestimating.

Where MET-based estimates are used beyond fitness apps

Outside of consumer calorie counting, MET values are widely used in public health research to classify and compare physical activity levels across large populations — the basis, for example, of national guidelines that define “moderate” and “vigorous” activity in MET terms — and in clinical exercise prescription, where a target MET range helps set safe activity levels for people recovering from cardiac events or managing chronic conditions.

What this assumes, and where it stops

Assumptions

  • MET values from the 2011 Compendium apply to you at average efficiency.
  • Activity was performed continuously at the stated intensity.

Limitations

  • Individual variation of ±20% or more is normal. Fitness, technique, terrain, wind and temperature all matter.
  • MET values were derived largely from adults of average body composition and are less accurate at the extremes.
  • Excess post-exercise oxygen consumption — the "afterburn" — is not included. It is real but much smaller than commonly claimed.

Common questions

Why is my fitness tracker showing a different number?

Trackers estimate from heart rate and movement, neither of which measures oxygen consumption directly. Independent testing consistently finds errors of 20–50%, usually overestimating. A MET-based estimate is not perfect either, but it is transparent — you can see exactly which constant produced the answer.

Should I eat back the calories I burned?

If you do, use the net figure rather than the gross one, since your calculated daily requirement already includes resting expenditure. And given that both the burn estimate and your food logging carry error, eating back only part of it is the more reliable approach.

Sources

Formula and content last reviewed on .

Results are estimates for information only, not professional advice.

Report an error

Tools people commonly use alongside the calories burned calculator.

See all health & fitness calculators →